How Should Government Promote Stable Families?

While the achievement of marriage equality will be a tremendous step, it comes at a time when an extended recession has drawn attention to the economic fragility of contemporary families. When two parents are required to support a child (or when only one is available), the consequences of unemployment or underemployment can be devastating for the whole family. When un- and underemployment are widespread, extended families, neighbors, and charitable organizations are likely to find their ability to help greatly curtailed. The leisure time that would allow some citizens to help others is eaten up in the search for economic stability.

The existing social safety net has proven inadequate. Programs like unemployment insurance and food stamps help to ameliorate some of the burden of the recession for some people, but their counter-cyclical nature brings increased calls for the restriction of government spending just when such spending would seem most necessary. There is no suitable program for the underemployed.

A more effective means of helping families in times of economic crisis would be permanent, systematic reforms in which the breadth of the more stable the citizenship system was expanded to serve as a better compliment to the dynamism of capitalism.

  • Real health care reform is at the top of my list (more here).
  • I think it is worth considering local or state-sponsored childcare as a way to promote families by diminishing the leisure and economic trade-offs of having children.
  • Inasmuch as most higher-end jobs require basic computer literacy, a permanent program for providing such classes to both children and adults could be a huge boon to both our economy and to individual social mobility.
  • We need to reverse the trend of shifting the cost of higher education from the state to the students. That trend threatens to substitute the capitalist model for the citizenship model, reinforcing social stratification in what should be the brightest path for social mobility.

Each of these programs could both boost our overall economy and greatly help families in weathering the worst storms of capitalist dynamism. Families that could count on health care, childcare, and access to increased education could afford to risk part of their leisure time on entrepreneurship in good economic times. In hard times, such programs would help them maintain some of their pool of leisure time. With that time they could aid their neighbors, engage in political activism, better themselves, or ensure a brighter future for their children. In short, they could continue as citizens in the midst of a capitalist crisis.

 

(For the other posts in this sequence on family, see here and here.)

Should the Government Promote “Traditional” Families?

Insofar as it is ‘traditional’ to organize families around a legal marriage of two consenting adults, recognized by the state, and securing for them certain rights, I do believe the government has an interest in promoting ‘traditional’ families. But I do not believe the state has a compelling interest in denying marriage to same-sex couples….

A Government Interest in Promoting Stable Families

I believe that government does have a compelling interest in promoting the formation of stable families. To explain my thinking, let me first return to the framework of capitalism and citizenship at the foundation of this blog. As I have explained before, I see citizenship and capitalism as the two dominant and indispensable systems structuring American society…

Virginia Electoral Vote Plan: Unconstitutional?

The legislature in Virginia is considering changing the way they divide the state’s electoral votes. In case you don’t remember, each state receives EVs equal to their number of U.S. Representatives (proportional by population) and U.S. Senators (2 per state). In most states, those electoral votes go en masse to the winner of the state….

On The West Wing and the Republican Party of Today

Lately I have been watching a lot of The West Wing, the Emmy winning Aaron Sorkin political drama that ran from 1999 to 2006. At the time, it was criticized for representing a liberal fantasy thatrelying too often on simply “doing the right thing” and making a good speech as the answer to political problems….

On Gary Johnson

In my last post, I was pretty clear about why I think third party presidential votes are a bad idea. But I have to say more about one of those candidates: Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party. Johnson is perhaps the closest I’ve seen in my political life to a third party candidate worth supporting….

Why I Did Not Vote for a Third Party Presidential Candidate

The other night I took another of those online tests to see who you should be voting for. You know the type. They ask a set of questions on your policy views and then tell you which candidate you should vote for. Many people, myself included, find that their preferences match more closely with a…

Choosing a Presidential Candidate

I should be grading, preparing new lectures, or otherwise tackling a productive task. But I seem to know a surprising number of swing voters (albeit none living in swing states). So I want to suggest a few things to keep in mind when choosing a presidential candidate.   1) You are voting for a party…

Has the President Read This Blog?

Ok, yes, I know that’s unlikely, especially considering my dearth of posts lately. But after listening to his speech tonight (while proctoring a final exam for my students), I noticed this first part of James Fallows’ assessment:   1) Citizen Obama. The most interesting “new”-ish approach in the speech was the theme that ran through the final one-third…

John Roberts: A Moderate Chief Justice

In my pre-ACA ruling posts, I was critical of Chief Justice Roberts but also still holding out hope that he’d find a way to thread the needle. Now I’m ready to congratulate him on a job well done. Here are what I regard as the highlights of the ACA ruling: A sound principle of judicial…